mirror of
https://git.netfilter.org/nftables
synced 2026-01-26 10:34:27 +00:00
d79c158708
In particular: - Mention that grouping of chains in tables is irrelevant to the evaluation order. - Clarify that priorities only define the ordering of chains per hook. - Improved potentially ambiguous wording “lower priority values have precedence over higher ones”, which could be mistaken as that rules from lower priority chains might “win” over such from higher ones (which is however only the case if they drop/reject packets). The new wording merely describes which chains are evaluated first, implicitly referring the question which verdict “wins” to the section where verdicts are described, and also should work when lower priority chains mangle packets (in which case they might actually be considered as having “precedence”). Signed-off-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <mail@christoph.anton.mitterer.name> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>