diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-12-19 08:28:02 +1200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-12-19 08:28:02 +1200 |
| commit | eb23a1198d2317072a44ac1b8f5742f4cb48ce2c (patch) | |
| tree | 2d2f87c270e4b0be2a959beb39139b8ad5ad080b /drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | |
| parent | 14e0e8d0fcf24963e641ba375aa2e069f0bd2c1c (diff) | |
| parent | 277141a897c715e787f6c51e5db32f2ca90b00dc (diff) | |
Merge tag 'pm-6.19-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
Pull power management fixes from Rafael Wysocki:
"These fix three issues in the power capping code including one recent
regression and a runtime PM framework regression introduced during the
6.17 development cycle:
- Fix CPU hotplug locking deadlock reported by lockdep after a recent
update of the Intel RAPL power capping driver (Srinivas Pandruvada)
- Fix sscanf() error return value handling in the power capping core
and a race condition in register_control_type() (Sumeet Pawnikar)
- Fix a concurrent bit field update issue in the runtime PM core code
by only updating the bit field in question when runtime PM is
disabled (Rafael Wysocki)"
* tag 'pm-6.19-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
powercap: intel_rapl: Fix possible recursive lock warning
PM: runtime: Do not clear needs_force_resume with enabled runtime PM
powercap: fix sscanf() error return value handling
powercap: fix race condition in register_control_type()
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c index b9d87e56cbbc..3ff6da3bf4e6 100644 --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c @@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ end: return ret; } -int rapl_package_add_pmu(struct rapl_package *rp) +int rapl_package_add_pmu_locked(struct rapl_package *rp) { struct rapl_package_pmu_data *data = &rp->pmu_data; int idx; @@ -2040,8 +2040,6 @@ int rapl_package_add_pmu(struct rapl_package *rp) if (rp->has_pmu) return -EEXIST; - guard(cpus_read_lock)(); - for (idx = 0; idx < rp->nr_domains; idx++) { struct rapl_domain *rd = &rp->domains[idx]; int domain = rd->id; @@ -2091,17 +2089,23 @@ int rapl_package_add_pmu(struct rapl_package *rp) return rapl_pmu_update(rp); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rapl_package_add_pmu_locked); + +int rapl_package_add_pmu(struct rapl_package *rp) +{ + guard(cpus_read_lock)(); + + return rapl_package_add_pmu_locked(rp); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rapl_package_add_pmu); -void rapl_package_remove_pmu(struct rapl_package *rp) +void rapl_package_remove_pmu_locked(struct rapl_package *rp) { struct rapl_package *pos; if (!rp->has_pmu) return; - guard(cpus_read_lock)(); - list_for_each_entry(pos, &rapl_packages, plist) { /* PMU is still needed */ if (pos->has_pmu && pos != rp) @@ -2111,6 +2115,14 @@ void rapl_package_remove_pmu(struct rapl_package *rp) perf_pmu_unregister(&rapl_pmu.pmu); memset(&rapl_pmu, 0, sizeof(struct rapl_pmu)); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rapl_package_remove_pmu_locked); + +void rapl_package_remove_pmu(struct rapl_package *rp) +{ + guard(cpus_read_lock)(); + + rapl_package_remove_pmu_locked(rp); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rapl_package_remove_pmu); #endif |